We Tried 11 Apollo.io Alternatives & Competitors for Lead Generation
By
Iga Wójtowicz
July 9, 2025
•
5 min read
We used Apollo.io for outbound, and hit the same issues many others report.
🟡 Outdated or missing leads 🟡 No built-in warmup 🟡 Deliverability dropped as we scaled
So we tested 11 real Apollo.io alternatives, not demos, actual tools, to see which performs better for lead generation.
In this guide, you’ll find: ✅ What each tool does better than Apollo ✅ Pros, cons, and clear use-case picks
Let’s help you pick the right alternative without wasting weeks testing.
Apollo.io vs. Top 11 Alternatives: Quick Comparison
Tool
Outreach Automation
Data Accuracy
AI SDR
Best For
Free Trial
Apollo.io
✅ Built-in
🟡 Mixed
❌ No
All-in-one sales platform
✅ Yes
Leadsforge
✅ Built-in
✅ Verified + enriched
✅ Yes
End-to-end outreach
✅ Yes
Clay
🟡 Partial (via Zapier)
✅ High
❌ No
Workflow-based enrichment
✅ Yes
Instantly
✅ Yes
🟡 Mixed (needs cleaning)
❌ No
Deliverability + inbox rotation
✅ Yes
Smartlead
✅ Yes (mass + rotating)
🟡 Mixed
❌ No
Multi-inbox cold email scale
✅ Yes
ZoomInfo
✅ Yes
✅ Very high
❌ No
Enterprise intent + firmographics
❌ No
Dropcontact
❌ No
✅ GDPR-compliant
❌ No
EU-based enrichment
✅ Yes
Lusha
❌ No
🟡 Mixed
❌ No
Chrome-based contact lookup
✅ Yes
Snov.io
✅ Yes
🟡 OK
❌ No
Budget-friendly email outreach
✅ Yes
Kaspr
❌ No
🟡 LinkedIn-only
❌ No
LinkedIn scraping + CRM sync
✅ Yes
Hunter.io
❌ No
🟡 Basic
❌ No
Solo founders email finding
✅ Yes
OutreachBin
✅ Yes
🟡 Basic scraping
❌ No
Freelancers doing cold outreach
✅ Yes
Why People Look for Apollo.io Alternatives
Apollo.io is a strong tool when you're just getting started.
It gives you contact data, email outreach, and automation in one place.
But once you scale, a few problems start to show up, and that’s when many people start looking for other options.
Here’s what we found (and what G2 reviews back up):
1. The data isn’t always accurate
While Apollo.io is a powerful tool, one area that could use improvement is the accuracy of contact data.” — G2 user
This image shows the Apollo G2 review
You get a lot of leads, but many are old, missing job titles, or have invalid emails. This means you spend more time cleaning data than actually reaching out.
2. Email delivery can be risky
“Sometimes emails bounce, or the person has already moved on from that company.” — G2 review
This image shows the Apollo G2 review
Apollo doesn’t include inbox warm-up, so your emails might land in spam if you're not using other tools to protect your domain.
3. The platform feels bloated
“I find the tool too complex to understand for new users. It would take a good 10 - 15 to fully explore the tool” — G2 review
There are a lot of features, but that also makes it feel heavy. For small teams or solo users, it’s more than you need.
4. No built-in AI SDR Apollo gives you tools, but it doesn't do the work for you. You still have to manage targeting, writing, sending, and follow-ups manually.
5. Support can be slow
“The support you get with Apollo is non-existent. The first red flag is that there is no option to call support.” — G2 review
This image shows the Apollo G2 review
If you're running live campaigns and something breaks, waiting days for help can cost you real opportunities.
Bottom line?
If you're a founder, SDR, or consultant trying to move fast, Apollo can slow you down.
That’s why we went out, tested 11 Apollo.io alternatives, and found what works better in different situations.
Let’s dive into those.
11 Best Apollo.io Alternatives for Lead Generation in 2025
Tool Name
Tagline
Reason to Include
Leadsforge
Best all-in-one for enrichment + outreach
Better data + automation, ideal for SDRs & founders
1. Leadsforge – Best All-in-One for Enrichment + Outreach
This image shows the Leadsforge homepage
Leadsforge helps you find leads and launch cold email campaigns without using five different tools.
In our comparison, most tools forced us to jump between scraping, verifying, warming, and sending.
Leadsforge stood out because it handled all of that in one place, from targeting to sending, without needing plug-ins or integrations.
It’s designed for teams that want to move fast, with verified leads and outreach built into a single workflow.
Apollo.io vs Leadsforge
Feature
Apollo.io
Leadsforge
Email Outreach
✅ Yes
✅ Yes
Verified Emails
🟡 Needs filtering
✅ Included
Email Warmup
❌ No
✅ Yes
Inbox Health Tools
❌ No
🟡 Not confirmed
Chrome Extension
✅ Yes
❌ No
Why It’s Better than Apollo
Apollo gives you access to a massive database, but it also gives you noisy data and leaves warmup and inbox setup to you.
Leadsforge gives you:
Verified emails included, so you don’t need to clean lists
Built-in warmup, reducing the risk of landing in spam
Simple outreach workflow, no Chrome extensions or Zapier setups required
It’s ideal for people who value speed, accuracy, and email deliverability in one place.
Leadsforge Pricing
This image shows the Leadsforge pricing
Monthly: $49/month – 2,000 export credits; unused credits roll over.
Yearly: $588/year – 28,000 credits upfront.
Optional: Add-on tiers up to 100,000 credits/month.
Free Trial: 100 credits available
Pros & Cons of Leadsforge
✅ Pros
⚠️ Cons
Enrichment + sending in one tool
No LinkedIn or phone data
Verified emails included
No native integrations (yet)
Built-in email warmup
No setup or configuration needed
This image shows the Leadsforge G2 review
⭐ Our Verdict
If you're spending too much time managing tools, Leadsforge gives you one clean platform to find leads, verify them, and launch cold emails, no filters, warmup add-ons, or extra cleanup.
It’s a strong fit for:
SDRs who want verified leads and solid sending in one place
Founders are tired of juggling enrichment, warmup, and outreach tools
Agencies that care more about inbox placement than integrations
Leadsforge isn’t bloated, it’s purpose-built for outbound teams who want results, not complexity.
Let’s move on to the next tool: Clay.
2. Clay – Best for Data Workflows & Enrichment
This image shows the Clay homepage
Clay lets you create custom workflows to find and enrich leads from multiple sources, using a visual, no-code interface.
Apollo.io vs Clay
Feature
Apollo.io
Clay
Email Outreach
✅ Yes
❌ No
Verified Emails
🟡 Sometimes
✅ Yes (via enrichment)
Enrichment Control
❌ Basic filters
✅ Full customization
Built-in Warmup
❌ No
❌ No
Visual Workflow Editor
❌ No
✅ Yes
Chrome Extension
✅ Yes
❌ No
Why It’s Better than Apollo
Apollo gives you a list, but not flexibility.
In Clay, we could combine LinkedIn, Crunchbase, Clearbit, and more in one flow, enrich leads deeply, and filter by real buying signals like tech used or recent hiring.
For us, the biggest win was quality control.
No guessing if the email was verified or if the company fit our ICP, we built the rules.
Clay Pricing
This image shows the Clay pricing
Free Plan: 100 credits/month.
Starter: $149/month – 2,000 credits.
Explorer: $349/month – 10,000 credits.
Pro: $800/month – 50,000 credits.
Enterprise: Custom pricing.
Pros & Cons of Clay
✅ Pros
⚠️ Cons
50+ data sources in one workflow
No built-in outreach or warmup
Deep enrichment + filtering options
Takes time to set up the first time
Visual, no-code builder
Not beginner-friendly
Ideal for ABM and ops-heavy teams
It can get pricey at scale
This image shows the Clay G2 review
This image shows the Clay G2 review
⭐ Our Verdict
Clay is perfect if you want to build lead lists your way, using live data, smart filters, and your own rules.
It’s a strong fit for:
Growth teams doing ICP-based targeting
Outbound ops leads who want more than static exports
Agencies doing ABM, enrichment, or custom scoring
If you care about lead quality, control, and building smarter workflows, Clay beats Apollo by miles.
Next: Instantly, the go-to if your goal is deliverability and volume.
3. Instantly – Best for Deliverability & Outreach Scale
This image shows the Instantly homepage
Instantly helps you send more cold emails without hurting deliverability by rotating inboxes and warming them up automatically.
Apollo.io vs Instantly
Feature
Apollo.io
Instantly
Cold Email Sending
✅ Yes
✅ Yes
Email Warmup
❌ No
✅ Yes
Inbox Rotation
❌ No
✅ Yes
Unified Inbox
❌ No
✅ Yes
Built-in Lead Data
✅ Yes
❌ No
CRM Integrations
✅ Yes
🟡 Basic
Why It’s Better than Apollo
Apollo lets you send, but doesn’t help you land in the inbox.
Instantly fixes that:
Warmup is fully automated, no external tools needed
You can rotate across inboxes to send more safely
One inbox to manage all replies, no more jumping between accounts
Its purpose-built for scale and deliverability, two areas where Apollo falls short.
Instantly Pricing
This image shows the Instantly.ai pricing
Growth: $47/month
Hypergrowth: $97/month
Hyper Credits: $197/month
Pros & Cons of Instantly
✅ Pros
⚠️ Cons
Auto warmup + inbox rotation
No built-in leads
Unified inbox for all replies
Limited CRM integrations
Scales to dozens of inboxes
No multichannel options
No setup needed to get started
Can get pricey
This image shows the Instantly G2 review
This image shows the Instantly G2 review
⭐ Our Verdict
If your outreach is growing and Apollo’s deliverability can’t keep up, Instantly is the fix.
It’s made for:
Cold email agencies managing volume + replies
Startups with new domains that need inbox protection
Outbound teams that care more about results than integrations
Now, let’s explore our next alternative, ZoomInfo, the heavyweight for verified B2B data.
4. ZoomInfo – Best for Enterprise-Grade B2B Contact Data
This image shows the ZoomInfo homepage
ZoomInfo is a premium B2B contact database built for teams that need large-scale, accurate, and deeply enriched company and decision-maker data.
Apollo.io vs ZoomInfo
Feature
Apollo.io
ZoomInfo
Contact Database
✅ Large, needs filtering
✅ Accurate, enriched
Intent Signals
🟡 Basic
✅ Strong intent data
Direct Dials
🟡 Sometimes
✅ Included
Outreach Tools
✅ Yes
❌ Add-on only
CRM Integration
✅ Yes
✅ Yes
Best For
Startups, SMBs
Mid-size to enterprise teams
Why It’s Better than Apollo
Apollo has solid contact coverage, but ZoomInfo wins on depth, accuracy, and intent.
You get real buying signals (intent data) to prioritize outreach
Filters are more advanced, helpful for narrowing down exact ICPs
It plugs directly into most CRMs, so syncing data is smooth
And it includes direct dials and org charts that Apollo often lacks
If you’re doing high-stakes outbound at scale, ZoomInfo gives you better targeting, faster.
ZoomInfo Pricing
ZoomInfo pricing is not listed publicly; you need to submit your details to view plans: zoominfo.com/plans
Add-ons and extra users may increase costs significantly.
Pros & Cons of ZoomInfo
Pros
Cons
Clean, up-to-date B2B contact data
Expensive, especially for small teams
Advanced filters + firmographics
Requires an annual contract
Intent signals to catch buyer intent
Limited outreach tools (email only via add-ons)
Strong CRM integrations
Steep learning curve for beginners
This image shows the ZoomInfo G2 review
This image shows the ZoomInfo G2 review
⭐ Our Verdict
ZoomInfo is built for scale. If you’re an outbound team selling to enterprise buyers and need accurate data, buying intent, and deep firmographics, this is the tool to bet on.
It’s not cheap. But for sales teams that rely on precision and speed, ZoomInfo delivers the quality that generic databases can’t match.
Next up is Dropcontact, the best fit if you’re focused on GDPR-compliant enrichment in the EU.
5. Dropcontact – Best for GDPR-Compliant Lead Enrichment
This image shows the Dropcontact homepage
Dropcontact helps you clean and enrich B2B contact data while staying 100% GDPR-compliant.
Apollo.io vs Dropcontact
Feature
Apollo.io
Dropcontact
Lead Database
✅ Yes
❌ No
Real-Time Enrichment
❌ No
✅ Yes
GDPR Compliance
🟡 Partial
✅ Full
Email Sending
✅ Yes
❌ No
Duplicate Detection
🟡 Limited
✅ Built-in
CRM Integration
✅ Yes
✅ Yes
Why It’s Better than Apollo
Apollo gives you a massive database, but it often includes outdated or incomplete contacts, especially for the EU.
Dropcontact does it differently:
It doesn’t store contacts, it builds and verifies them in real-time
All data is fully GDPR-compliant, with no personal storage
It works well for teams in the EU or anyone needing safer enrichment
It auto-detects and cleans duplicates, which Apollo misses
If you're running outbound in Europe or want cleaner data you can trust, Dropcontact is a better fit.
Dropcontact Pricing
This image shows the Dropcontact pricing
Monthly Plans: €29/month
Pros & Cons of Apollo
✅ Pros
⚠️ Cons
Real-time enrichment
No lead database
100% GDPR-compliant
Doesn’t send emails
Finds and merges duplicates
Setup requires a CSV or CRM
Integrates with CRMs
Less flexible for US targeting
This image shows the Dropcontact G2 review
This image shows the Dropcontact G2 review
⭐ Our Verdict
Dropcontact is ideal for teams that care more about clean, compliant data than big contact lists.
It’s especially useful for:
Outbound teams targeting Europe
Startups building their lead lists
CRM users who want automated cleanup + enrichment
It’s not a database or outreach tool, but if you already have leads and want them cleaned, verified, and GDPR-safe, Dropcontact is a smart alternative to Apollo.
Let’s now look at Lusha, a faster, plug-and-play tool for instant contact lookups.
6. Lusha – Best for Quick, Verified Contact Lookups
This image shows Lusha homepage
Lusha helps you find business emails and phone numbers directly from LinkedIn or company websites, fast and with high accuracy.
Apollo.io vs Lusha
Feature
Apollo.io
Lusha
Contact Database
✅ Yes
🟡 Smaller scope
Phone Numbers
🟡 Some direct
✅ Mostly direct
Email Outreach
✅ Built-in
❌ None
Works on LinkedIn
🟡 Indirect
✅ Chrome extension
GDPR Compliance
🟡 Partial
✅ Yes
Best For
Full outbound
Fast contact lookup
Why It’s Better than Apollo
Apollo is powerful, but it’s built for end-to-end outbound. If all you need is fast, accurate contact info, Lusha is simpler and faster.
Here’s why:
It works directly on LinkedIn, click, reveal, done
Phone number accuracy is stronger (especially in the U.S.)
You don’t need to run campaigns or manage lists to use it
Fully GDPR-compliant with clear usage limits
If you're short on time and just want to build contact lists without setting up sequences, Lusha is a smoother experience.
Lusha Pricing
This image shows the Lusha pricing
Free Plan: 50 credits/month.
Pro: $22.45/month.
Premium: $51/month.
Pros & Cons of Lusha
Pros
Cons
Easy-to-use Chrome extension
Smaller database than Apollo
Verified phone + email data
No built-in email outreach
Works directly on LinkedIn
Limited filters or segmentation
GDPR-compliant and accurate
No team-wide workflow tools
This image shows the Lusha G2 review
⭐ Our Verdict
Lusha is best for sales reps and recruiters who want to find contacts quickly, without dealing with full campaign tools.
It’s especially useful for:
People sourcing leads directly from LinkedIn
Recruiters needing direct phone numbers
Teams working in the U.S. or EMEA with privacy concerns
Next, let’s break down Snov.io, an Apollo-style tool with built-in email sending.
7. Snov.io – Best for All-in-One Cold Outreach
This image shows the Snov.io homepage
Snov.io is a platform designed to help you find leads, verify emails, and send personalized email campaigns, all from one place.