

For a thorough understanding of what each option offers, a simplified comparison table isn't enough to grasp all intricacies that come with each tool, so let's dive deeper into what makes Kaspr, Lusha and Leadsforge unique.
All three vendors pitch the same core promise - give sales teams contact details and verified leads so reps can spend time selling instead of researching.
Those positioning differences reflect how each product prioritizes prospecting tool design. For teams anchored to LinkedIn profiles and a chrome extension workflow, Kaspr and Lusha both deliver tight experiences.
On the other hand, teams who additionally want to streamline their ICP search and desire high quality waterfall enrichment that queries multiple sources until it finds verified contact details, Leadsforge is deliberately tuned for those needs.
Kaspr provides tiered, credit-based plans with discounts for annual billing + a free plan with limited credits:
Lusha also provides tiered, credit-based plans (annual billing includes discounts) + a free plan with limited credits:
Leadsforge provides a straightforward credits-based plan (discounts with annual billing) as well as a free trial that also provides 100 export credits:
Raw coverage numbers are shorthand but important:
Data accuracy is the first KPI for any prospecting tool.
Leadsforge, on the other hand, emphasizes waterfall data enrichment and real-time validation.
If your playbook needs phone numbers and decent European-specific coverage, Kaspr’s emphasis matters, if your team measures success by connect rate, then Lusha’s accuracy numbers are compelling.
However, for many modern prospecting teams the operational difference comes from the enrichment process: Leadsforge’s waterfall enrichment and on-the-fly verification reduce manual enrichment and re-search cycles, which can translate to fewer bounced emails, fewer dead phone numbers returned by reps, and faster pipeline creation.
Practically speaking: if your SDR team lives in LinkedIn and wants immediate contact details on current pages, a basic LinkedIn Chrome extension is convenient.
But if you ever need to describe a complex ICP and want to receive a curated list with LinkedIn profiles, verified emails and phone numbers pushed in bulk - Leadsforge is the go-to.
Kaspr offers a dashboard where teams can manage leads, run bulk enrichments, and set up automations. That’s familiar to BDRs who want simple extension-driven discovery plus a lightweight lead management view.
Lusha frames its product with an AI-driven discovery chat plus a Chrome extension and prospect playlists. Its UI promises daily lead streaming and automation pipelines.
For Leadsforge, a seamless and easy search experience is a core philosophy: instead of building complex filters, you describe your ICP in plain language and the engine returns enriched leads. That chat-first UX reduces friction for non-technical users and increasing speed-to-list.
In a nutshell:
Integrations turn data into action - they connect lead data to CRMs, outreach, analytics, and workflows, enabling automation, real-time syncing, personalized outreach, accurate tracking, and scalable handoffs - reducing manual work and improving conversion velocity and data-driven decision-making.
Kaspr lists integrations with HubSpot, Salesforce, Zoho, Aircall and Zapier, and supports CSV export and API workflows - useful for teams that want to push contact details into existing tools or Google Sheets.
Lusha highlights an extensive integrations set too: Salesforce, HubSpot, Outreach and an API and MCP streaming to route data into CRMs, automations and AI tools.
Leadsforge is designed to fit right into your existing workflow while focusing only on integrations that are vital, meaning seamless and valuable integrations are core to its value proposition:
Or even just seamlessly pushing into the Forge stack for immediate outreach - Leadsforge caters to any and all potential integration needs.
Adoption often fails for tooling that lacks team and permission structures.
For distributed teams that care about operational rigor, Lusha has a broad team/enterprise feature set, Kaspr offers an easy workspace for SMB teams, and Leadsforge’s advantage is in handing teams higher-quality lists with verification metadata so SDRs and AEs waste less time cleaning contacts.
Kaspr, Lusha and Leadsforge all support marketing and sales professionals, but their customer-support tones differ.
Despite Leadsforge's UI having a practically non-existent learning curve, in case issues do arise, Leadsforge complements 24/7 email and live chat support with:
And a general customer-success focus on helping teams optimize warming, domain configuration, and sequence performance.
For teams that need hands-on help as soon as possible, Leadsforge's combination of resources and support is guaranteed to maintain your workflow as efficiently as possible.
If your workflow is LinkedIn-first and you sell heavily into Europe, Kaspr is a great fit - its emphasis on telephone coverage and its LinkedIn Chrome extension make it a very pragmatic prospecting tool for many sales teams.
If your organization needs a mature platform with very broad integrations and strong compliance certifications - Lusha is compelling, though its 280M+ database isn't as big as Kaspr's or Leadsforge's.
If you prioritize a fast path from ICP to clean, verified contact lists with state-of-the-art waterfall data enrichment, an intuitive chat-based search, and exports that feed multi-channel outreach with fewer manual enrichment passes, Leadsforge stands out.
Leadsforge’s chat-first UX and waterfall enrichment reduce manual lookups and enrichment churn. For teams that measure success by meetings booked per credit and want real time data and verification before outreach, Leadsforge often delivers better operational efficiency and lower effective cost per usable contact.
Leadsforge differs from the Kaspr vs Lusha dynamic by prioritizing an intuitive interface and chat-first ICP search rather than a Chrome extension or LinkedIn Sales Navigator-centric flow. Kaspr database and Kaspr’s LinkedIn account/extension focus on phone numbers and on-page capture; Lusha leans extension + intent data. Leadsforge trades browser scraping for waterfall enrichment, real time data validation, bulk exports and predictable credit math for faster outreach and cleaner lists.
Leadsforge uses credits-based pricing with a Starter/Essential plan and discounts on annual plans; credits roll over so cost-per-export is predictable. For high-volume needs you can request a custom plan or scale plan from sales. This model contrasts with extension-first vendors and helps teams model campaign spend and ROI by one-credit rules for emails and higher credit counts for phone numbers.
Yes - Leadsforge supports CSV export, an open API, webhooks and common CRM integrations so data flows into Salesforce and HubSpot. Its platform also supports team management (shared credits, role controls) and export metadata so reps know match confidence before import - making CRM inegration and handoffs to automation features smoother for revenue teams.
Leadsforge focuses on verified phone numbers (phone-verified mobile numbers priced predictably) and real time data validation via waterfall enrichment. That reduces bounces and bad dials and improves outreach cadence. Combine this with intent data exports and automation features to prioritize actions - higher connect rates, fewer manual updates, and faster sequence starts from clean contact lists.
Yes - while not extension-first like Kaspr/Lusha, Leadsforge returns LinkedIn URLs in enriched lists so LinkedIn Sales Navigator workflows still work. Its intuitive interface, export-first UX, team management, and automation features support scale. For teams needing extensive features and enterprise controls, request a custom plan or scale plan and compare credit economics to other vendors.