The more leads we enriched with FullEnrich, the more problems we uncovered.
It started small, slow API calls, missing firmographics, rigid pricing. But as volume grew, so did the friction:
So I went hands-on with three alternatives that promised to fix those pain points: Leadsforge, Clearbit, and Apollo.io.
This blog breaks down exactly what worked, what didn’t, and which tool is best depending on your use case. You’ll get:
If FullEnrich is starting to slow you down, this post will save you the trial-and-error.
Let's get into it.
Despite its promise as a B2B data enrichment platform, many users find FullEnrich limiting once their workflows scale or diversify.
Below are the most common issues that drive teams to seek alternatives:
As companies grow their lead volumes, FullEnrich’s pricing becomes harder to justify, especially for agencies and fast-growing ops teams.
Several users reported getting incorrect or conflicting company information from the platform.
FullEnrich often works for broad persona data, but it struggles when users need deep firmographic or technographic filters.
Multiple reviews mention CRM sync—particularly with HubSpot—being buggy, unreliable, or requiring manual workarounds.
FullEnrich’s lower-tier plans often restrict access to advanced field mapping or enrichment controls, pushing users toward costly enterprise upgrades.
Leadsforge is a lightweight lead enrichment tool focused on speed, simplicity, and clean data.
Unlike FullEnrich, which can feel heavy, expensive, and rigid, Leadsforge lets you quickly enrich leads with job titles, emails, company info, and more, using a clean UI or API.
It’s built for teams that don’t want to deal with complicated dashboards or custom setup.
You don’t need filters or advanced logic.
Just describe your ideal leads, and it pulls accurate results using a waterfall of data sources, meaning if one source misses, it checks another.
Where FullEnrich focuses on volume and depth, Leadsforge prioritizes speed, control, and usability.
If you just want something that works, fast, simple, and accurate, Leadsforge is a solid choice.
It’s not bloated, it doesn’t get in your way, and you don’t need to overthink anything.
It’s a great pick if you're handling outbound in a small team, want results quickly, and don’t need heavy integrations.
Now, if your workflow depends more on syncing data across multiple tools or building automated flows inside your CRM, the next option might be a better fit.
Let’s look at Clearbit.
Clearbit, now called Breeze by HubSpot, is a real-time lead enrichment tool that adds firmographic and technographic data to your contacts, directly inside your CRM.
Compared to FullEnrich, which can require external uploads or manual syncing, Breeze is designed for teams using HubSpot, Salesforce, or Segment.
It updates contact records automatically, so your sales and marketing teams always work with fresh, enriched data.
It’s especially useful if your team relies heavily on a CRM and wants data enrichment to happen in the background, without spreadsheets or extra tools.
Clearbit (Breeze) does not list exact pricing publicly.
Based on past data, plans often started at around $150/month, but current pricing likely varies based on features, usage, and team size.
You’ll need to speak with their sales team to get a quote.
If FullEnrich feels like too much manual effort or too little sync with your CRM, Breeze offers a more connected experience.
It’s best for growing RevOps and Marketing teams that rely on CRM automation and want lead enrichment to be fully integrated.
Next, let’s explore Apollo.io, a more flexible platform that combines enrichment with outreach tools.
Apollo.io gives you both lead enrichment and outreach tools in one place.
That means you can find leads, get their emails and company info, and contact them, all inside the same platform.
Compared to FullEnrich, which only does enrichment, Apollo also lets you:
You can search their full database of millions of contacts, enrich them with real-time data, and launch your campaigns without switching tools.
Apollo uses a monthly subscription + credits system. Each action (like exporting a lead) uses credits.
If FullEnrich gives you good data but leaves you stuck when it’s time to actually reach out, Apollo fixes that.
You get enrichment and outreach together, with a database, cold email tool, and integrations included.
It’s best for sales teams or founders who want to find leads and contact them without juggling multiple tools.
➡️ With that, we’ve seen three strong alternatives to FullEnrich, now let’s wrap it all up.
If you're unhappy with FullEnrich, the right replacement depends on what you're missing most, speed, CRM support, or the ability to act on data quickly.
Here’s a clear breakdown:
This should make the choice easier.
Each of these tools fixes a key frustration with FullEnrich, so think about which part of your process is slowing you down the most.
Now let’s wrap things up with the final verdict.
FullEnrich might be a solid starting point, but once your team needs more speed, control, or flexibility, it starts falling short.
The cost rises as your lead volume grows, CRM syncing can feel clunky, and it’s not built for teams running fast outbound motions or custom workflows.
Here’s what I found after testing the top alternatives:
If you're still using FullEnrich but feeling held back, now’s the time to explore better options.
👉 Try Leadsforge if you want simple, real-time enrichment that just works, no sales calls, no waiting.